Skip to content

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Dec 17, 2024

Depending on how e2e is run, we may not have a k8s client available.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@tmshort tmshort requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2024 16:00
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 854432d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/6761a9421cfe4e00092e5007
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1529--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.68%. Comparing base (d3f267a) to head (854432d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1529   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.68%   74.68%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        3271     3271           
=======================================
  Hits         2443     2443           
  Misses        652      652           
  Partials      176      176           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 52.15% <ø> (ø)
unit 57.99% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Depending on how e2e is run, we may not have a k8s client available.

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

We need to do the same in the catalogd
and probably in the future have this logic as an utils / func to just re-use in any test

Thank you. That was a good thought

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 17, 2024
@tmshort tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 17, 2024
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Dec 17, 2024

Ok, I'll make a corresponding change to catalogd.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Dec 17, 2024

See operator-framework/catalogd#485 @camilamacedo86 for the catalogd version

Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit cd290ba Dec 17, 2024
18 checks passed
@tmshort tmshort deleted the skip-metrics branch December 17, 2024 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants